Posts Tagged ‘Tax’

Taxpayers will waste nearly £1.3 billion this year due to poor IHT

Monday, April 25th, 2011

According to the annual Tax Actions Report released by ‘Unbiased.co.uk’,UK taxpayers will waste nearly £1.3 billion this year due to poor inheritance tax (IHT) planning.  This tax wastage is only set to increase further in the future after the chancellor announced in 2010 that the threshold would remain frozen for four years at £325,000 rather than rising in line with inflation.

The top three findings in the report are as follows:

  • Inheritance tax is Britain’s second biggest tax waste area making up 10% of the overall tax wasted in the UK
  • So called ’death tax’ makes it into the top five of taxes Brits most want to abolish
  • Almost nine out of ten people have done nothing in the past 12 months to reduce the amount of tax they pay

Read the full story here

Sources:

Unbiased.co.uk

Latest news on tax and trusts from Solicitors Journal

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

David Bird from Solicitor’s Journal reviews the latest developments in tax and estate planning, including negligible value claims for CGT, inheritance tax and agricultural property relief.

David suggests that “Although the expected increase in CGT rates did not materialise, it is safe to assume that the rate of CGT will not remain at 18 per cent for much longer and the second Budget of 2010 will probably increase the rate (and vindicate the advice and legal work which was carried out earlier in the year).”

If you are thinking of disposing of an asset, do it while CGT is still at 18%

Read the full article here.

What are the tax implications under a Con-Lib coalition government?

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

This week the STEP Journal give their analysis of tax implications under the new coalition government.

Read the full article here or see the excerpt below


“Both Conservatives and Liberal Democrats were obliged to drop some of their campaign promises when agreeing to form a coalition government on Tuesday.

Tory plans to raise the inheritance tax nil rate band to GBP1 million have been shelved for the duration of this parliament. The LibDem proposal for a “mansion tax” on houses worth more than GBP2 million has been dropped, probably for ever.

However the most significant news is that the new chancellor, George Osborne, will soon present an emergency Budget raising capital gains tax rates to levels “similar or close to those applied to income” – that is, from 18 per cent to 40 per cent, in line with the Liberal Democrats’ election manifesto.

The new rate will, however, only apply to non-business assets, and there are to be “generous exemptions for entrepreneurial business activities”. This means shares, second homes and buy-to-let property will be the main targets of the tax.

Newspapers, including the Financial Times, are predicting heavy selling of these assets before the new rate comes into force. It is not yet clear whether the change will be implemented immediately or even retrospectively.

“The hope is that any change will not be before 2010/11 to allow sensible business and tax decisions to be made in good time”, said Francesca Lagerberg, head of tax at accountants Grant Thornton.

Another ominous passage in the coalition’s joint policy statement promises that “all efforts will be made to tackle tax avoidance, including detailed development of Liberal Democrat proposals.

“This could include a campaign proposal by Vince Cable (now a minister) for a general anti-avoidance provision for corporation tax.

Before the election the party also advocated closing “loopholes” such as preventing the avoidance of stamp duty land tax by transferring property into offshore trusts, restricting non-dom status to a maximum of seven years, and stopping business owners paying themselves in dividends taxed at 18 per cent.

The Tories’ proposal for limited transferability of personal tax allowance between spouses has not been dropped, but Liberal Democrat MPs will be allowed to abstain on budget resolutions dealing with it.

The emergency budget will appear before the end of June, aided by an independent Office for Budget Responsibility.

A full spending review will be held during the summer, reporting in autumn. This will follow a “fully consultative process involving all tiers of government and the private sector”, says the new government.”

Source

STEP Journal

Government agrees to preserve tax relief on holiday lets

Friday, April 9th, 2010

STEP reports that the government has agreed to remove from the Finance Bill its proposed abolition of tax relief on holiday lettings. But the measure will be revived after the election if a Labour government is returned

Read the full article at the STEP Journal or read the extract below.


“The measure was announced last October and scheduled for the 2010-11 Budget. It duly appeared in the first draft of the Finance Bill as Clause 65 and Schedule 21, stating that letting furnished holiday accommodation would no longer be treated as a trade for certain tax allowance purposes, for example so-called sideways relief.

The Conservatives estimate that the change would affect more than 120,000 businesses, costing the owners an average of GBP4,000 each a year. It would raise GBP25 million in 2011/12 and GBP15 million in 2012/13.

But a general election has now been called and the Finance Bill has to be forced through within two days. This gave opposition politicians the chance to demand concessions from Chief Secretary to the Treasury Liam Byrne. They chose three – the holiday lettings tax, the “cider tax” and the “broadband tax”.

According to The Times, both George Osborne (Conservative shadow Chancellor) and Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury) claimed credit for the government’s retreat.

Both opposition parties have attacked the measure in the Commons, agreeing with many business associations that it could damage the British tourism industry.

The abolition of holiday let relief was originally triggered by a European Commission ruling that the UK government could not apply it only to homes in Britain; it had to apply to homes anywhere in Europe, or none at all.

The government decided to accommodate this by making the relief apply to all homes during 2008-10, and then abolishing it altogether from April 2010.

Financial Secretary to the Treasury Stephen Timms said that, if the measure doesn’t go ahead, the Treasury will have to pay tax relief to everyone with a holiday home within the EU.

So owners of holiday lets in European Union member states now have an extra window of opportunity to claim tax relief. The election result will determine how long the window remains open.”

Ten ways to beat the stealth taxes in the Budget 2010

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

The Telegraph has publish ten tips for beating the Budget.

“Once again, the Government is going for the jugular as it attacks your income and your wealth. But there are ways to fight back.”

Read the full article here

A Cautionary Tale

Friday, October 30th, 2009

A CAUTIONARY TALE

Stan and his son Peter lived in the same part of town. Stan’s was the old family house and, now that he was widowed it was, he agreed, a bit big for him. One day when he was having tea with Peter, his wife June and their four children in their little three bed semi an idea was born. Stan can’t remember who suggested it first, but before the month was out, Stan had moved into the little semi and Peter, June and their kids were in the family house. “We’ll carry on paying the mortgage on our house Dad”, said Peter “and we’ll get your old place sorted out too – new kitchen, conservatory, nice bit of decking in the garden and so on. But look, don’t tell our Susan in the States, she wouldn’t understand.”

Everything was fine for a few years, Stan was snug in the semi, the old house was full of children’s voices and the money and effort Peter and June put in to improving it really showed. Stan and Peter handed each other the post that arrived, including the annual mortgage statements on the semi. Then one day Peter sad “Dad I’ve just been told that, if you go ga-ga and have to go into a Home, our house (sorry Dad I mean your house) will have to be sold. Why don’t you give it to me and June now, then they won’t be able to get at it? Our Susan’s OK, she’s worth a mint and anyway, you could give her your savings when you die.”

So Stan went to see his solicitor Gillian. She had thought he was still living in the big house. She said he should have talked to her before swapping houses. She explained he had no security of tenure at the semi. If Peter and June didn’t keep up the mortgage payments or got divorced, he could lose his home. It could take years of expensive litigation to get them out of the house. By letting Peter and June spend money on the old place, Stan had let them build up part ownership of it anyway. Oh and there was the capital gains tax, on the increase in both houses. They’d all lost their exemptions by swapping.

“And don’t give yours to them” she said, “even in exchange for a right to occupy the semi. You’re still at risk of being assessed as owning it if you need care, as well as all the other problems”. Well Stan wouldn’t listen. He insisted on going ahead. Gillian protected him as best she could,  but she knew it might not be enough.

Peter lost his job when the recession hit. The mortgage went unpaid, the stress meant he and June split up, the semi was being sold over his head. Maybe it was that caused Stan’s stroke. Anyway, he’s in a Home now. June and the children are still in the big house. The council say it is Fred’s ‘notional capital’ because he only gave it away to avoid paying for care, so he doesn’t know where he’ll go when his savings run out.

If only he’d come to me first, not last. With proper advice at the right time, everyone could have benefited. Remember, your first meeting with me is ‘no obligation’. Don’t delay!